Gay San Francisco Lesbian San Francisco




























News :: GLBT

Schwarzenegger says "No" to anti-gay marriage amendment
by Allison Hoffman
Associated Press
Saturday Apr 12, 2008

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger gestures while answering questions concerning his support for proposed measure for volunteers to work on public works programs at a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, April 7, 2008.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger gestures while answering questions concerning his support for proposed measure for volunteers to work on public works programs at a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, April 7, 2008.    (Source:AP/Rich Pedroncelli)
Email Print Share
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Friday that he would fight an initiative to amend the California Constitution to ban same-sex marriage if it qualifies for the November ballot.

Schwarzenegger has vetoed bills that would allow gay marriage but said he opposes the sort of amendments that are being proposed by two competing groups. Such amendments are already on the books in 26 states, but the governor said it would be a "waste of time" to pursue one in California.

"I will always be there to fight against that," Schwarzenegger said, prompting loud cheers and a standing ovation from about 200 people at the annual convention of the Log Cabin Republicans, the nation’s largest gay Republican group.

The Austrian-born governor immediately cracked that he wished activists would instead focus on passing an amendment to allow naturalized citizens to run for president.

Both proposed initiatives would limit marriage to heterosexuals, and one measure would revoke the spousal rights and tax benefits currently extended to same-sex couples under state laws.

Schwarzenegger supports the current benefits for same-sex couples. In vetoing bills that would have legalized gay marriage, he has said he thinks the question should be up to voters or the courts, not lawmakers.

Geoffrey Kors, executive director of the gay rights group Equality California, said Schwarzenegger’s opposition could help defeat a marriage ban or even prevent it from getting enough signatures to qualify for the ballot.

"We were thrilled. We have been asking him to do this," said Kors, whose group’s volunteers have been working to persuade people not to sign petitions for the proposed initiative. "The governor’s support to defeat it is critical."

Kors said Schwarzenegger’s stand has precedent. In 1978, former Republican Gov. Ronald Reagan came out against a ballot initiative that would have made it illegal for gay men and lesbians to work as teachers in California public schools, an act that "made gay rights issues nonpartisan," Kors said.

Proponents of the initiatives said Schwarzenegger is risking the ire of conservative voters.

"He says he’ll veto legislation redefining marriage but now he says he’ll fight a ballot measure protecting marriage," said Randy Thomasson, of VoteYesMarriage.com, whose amendment would revoke domestic-partnership benefits including hospital visitation, community property and child support. "He’s pandering to this group."

Andrew Pugno, a lawyer for ProtectMarriage.com, said the intention of his group’s less far-reaching amendment was simply to keep the existing definition of marriage approved by the Legislature from being overturned by the courts.

Both groups have until April 28 to gather signatures from 694,354 voters to qualify the measures for the November election.

Schwarzenegger is a defendant in a group of lawsuits brought by same-sex couples seeking to overturn the state’s longtime statutory ban on gay marriage. A ruling in the case is expected soon from the California Supreme Court.


Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

COMMENTS
"Schwarzenegger says "No" to anti-gay marriage amendment"

Assemblymember Lloyd Levine, 2008-04-12 13:05:57
From Assemblymember Lloyd Levine (D-Woodland Hills, Los Angeles Co.)Assemblymember Lloyd Levine I’m glad to see the Governor does not want to erase years of progress. My hope is this November California voters will be galvanized and electrified by a sense of hope for the future, not limiting it. That’s why I am STRONGLY supporting the "Decline to Sign" campaign fighting to keep the same-sex marriage initiative off the ballot. Whether or not they succeed, California voters will be put on notice that this potential ban would write discrimination into the state’s Constitution. It’s certainly not lost on most voters that the anti-gay marriage initiative is also a shameless tactic used by Republicans before to get voters to the polls. Recently, Arizona voters saw they were being played for fools by the Republicans and defeated a similar same-sex marriage ban. The proposed constitutional amendment specifies that only marriage between a man and a woman be valid or recognized in California. The arguments by anti-gay groups are glaringly weak. I have always supported same-sex marriage because I believe in a person’s civil rights, the United States Constitution and separation of Church and State. This country is not based on one faith or one moral code. Race, sex, religion and sexual orientation must never affect our civil rights. We all have equal rights under the law. In March 2005 a Superior Court judge in San Francisco ruled that the law denying same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The state appealed and the California Court of Appeals in a split decision overturned the ruling. It was then appealed to the California Supreme Court. In March the justices heard arguments in the case and a decision is expected in the next three months. I believe the California Supreme Court will rule that the equal-protection clauses of the state’s Constitution trumps the state law defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Throughout this legal wrangling, the California Legislature also passed several bills allowing same-sex marriage but they were vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. I have been a co-author on each of them and am proud to be part of that history-making moment. Same-sex couples are as likely as straight couples to live healthy, happy, productive lives and provide a good environment to raise children. The arguments offered by opponents to equal rights are retreads of the rhetoric used about Catholics marrying Protestants or Protestants marrying someone of the Jewish faith. We should remember that it wasn’t too long ago that California state law prohibited interracial marriage. California is the most progressive, innovative state in the nation and I refuse to go anywhere but forward on this civil rights issue. ---------------------------------------------State Assembly + State Senate + LGBTIQ + Discrimination + Marriage EqualityBrowse in : All > Reports > Legislative Bodies > State Assembly All > Reports > Legislative Bodies > State Senate All > Reports > LGBTIQ All > Reports > LGBTIQ > Discrimination All > Reports > LGBTIQ > Marriage Equality Any of these categories - All of these categories There are no comments attached to this item. The Majority VoteWhich 2010 gubernatorial hopeful was most impressive at this week’s convention? Jerry Brown John Garamendi Gavin Newsom Fabian Nunez Jack O’Connell Steve Westly Results Majority Vote Archives Latest CommentsSteve, I realize this... in California Nurses Associa... by CaliforniaNursesShum Speier Makes a Splash -- ... in Speier Makes a Splash -- ... by Bill Bradley Huh? in Speier Makes a Splash -- ... by Steven Maviglio Speier Makes a Splash -- ... in Speier Makes a Splash -- ... by SDPolitico Obama Campaign Reinstates... in Obama Campaign Reinstates... by bawilli7
Avg. Rating: 12345
Rate it:
12345


Back to: News » Home


FREE STUFF
IN ORLANDO
Anderson Cooper Inches Out of the Closet
Last post on Feb 8, 2010 by NYC Gay Activist
Should gay ships stop in homophobic ports-’o-call?
Last post on Feb 8, 2010 by TiggerTampa
Junior Vasquez & Tight present the RED PARTY 02/14/2010
Last post on Feb 7, 2010 by Being Real
Behind the ManCrunch ad
Last post on Feb 6, 2010 by jsicolts
New Hampshire Towns Rejecting Reconsideration of Marriage Equality
Last post on Feb 5, 2010 by AnIrishBear

FEATURED BUSINESS

TRIGGER
SF’s sophisticated nightlife place

Put your business here»
BUY A HOME