News

Gay Marriage Defeated in Maine

by David Crary
Associated Press
Wednesday Nov 4, 2009
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (7)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
Partners Lisa Brackbill, left, and Lisa Pugh, right, both from Buckfield, Maine console one another along with Darlene Huntress, center, of Portland, after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at election night headquarters in Portland, Maine, early Wednesday morning, Nov. 4, 2009. Maine voters decided decide to rescind the Legislature’s approval of same-sex marriage.
Partners Lisa Brackbill, left, and Lisa Pugh, right, both from Buckfield, Maine console one another along with Darlene Huntress, center, of Portland, after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at election night headquarters in Portland, Maine, early Wednesday morning, Nov. 4, 2009. Maine voters decided decide to rescind the Legislature’s approval of same-sex marriage.  (Source:AP/Pat Wellenbach)

The stars seemed aligned for supporters of gay marriage. They had Maine’s governor, legislative leaders and major newspapers on their side, plus a huge edge in campaign funding. So losing a landmark referendum was a devastating blow, for activists in Maine and nationwide.

In an election that had been billed for weeks as too close to call, Maine’s often unpredictable voters repealed a state law Tuesday that would have allowed same-sex couples to wed. Gay marriage has now lost in all 31 states in which it has been put to a popular vote - a trend that the gay-rights movement had believed it could end in Maine.

"Today’s heartbreaking defeat unfortunately shows that lies and fear can still win at the ballot box," said Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

With 87 percent of the precincts reporting, gay-marriage foes had 53 percent of the vote. They prevailed in many of Maine’s far-flung small towns and lost by a less-than-expected margin in the state’s biggest city, Portland.

"The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation," declared Frank Schubert, chief organizer for the winning side.

Attention will now turn to other states, including California - where Schubert was an instrumental strategist a year ago in the successful campaign to overturn cost-ordered same-sex marriage.

Gay-rights activists have been planning to go back to the ballot in California, either in 2010 or 2012, in another attempt to legalize gay marriage. But the Maine result was not the victory they had been hoping for to fire up their troops.

Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage, a conservative group that steered substantial funds to fight gay marriage in both California and Maine, was elated by Tuesday’s result, saying it shows that "that even in a New England state, if the voters have a chance to have their say, they’re going to protect and defend the commonsense definition of marriage."

At issue in the referendum was a law passed by Maine’s Legislature last spring that would have allowed gays to wed. The law was put on hold after conservatives launched a petition drive to repeal it.

Five other states have legalized gay marriage - starting with Massachusetts in 2004, and followed by Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Iowa - but all did so through legislation or court rulings, not by popular vote. In contrast, constitutional amendments banning gay marriage have been approved in all 30 states where they have been on the ballot.

Brown said "out-of-touch legislators" are a principal reason same-sex marriage has taken hold in New England.

"What we’re saying is give us a chance to take our message to the people and let the people decide," he said. He also suggested that the outcome in Maine will give pause to lawmakers in New York and New Jersey, where gay-marriage legislation is pending.

Richard Socarides, who was an adviser on gay-rights issues in the Clinton administration, said the loss in Maine should prompt gay-rights leaders to reconsider their state-by-state strategy on marriage and shift instead to lobbying for changes on the federal level that expand recognition of same-sex couples.

In Maine, gay-marriage supporters conceded early Wednesday.

"We’re in this for the long haul," said Jesse Connolly, manager of the pro-gay marriage campaign. "For next week, and next month, and next year - until all Maine families are treated equally. Because in the end, this has always been about love and family and that will always be something worth fighting for.

A similar note was sounded by Democratic Gov. John Baldacci, who signed the bill into law last May and spoke out in defense of the law.

"If we don’t get to the top of the mountain tonight, we’ve made a significant stride. And we’re going to get there," he said late Tuesday. "We will get to the top of the mountain."

Both sides in Maine drew volunteers and contributions from out of state, but the money edge went to the campaign in defense of gay marriage, Protect Maine Equality. It raised $4 million, compared with $2.5 million for Stand for Marriage Maine.

Stand for Marriage based many of its campaign ads on claims - disputed by state officials - that the new law would mean "homosexual marriage" would be taught in public schools. That was the same theme used to persuade Californians to reject gay marriage.

Elsewhere on Tuesday, voters in Washington state voted on whether to uphold or overturn a recently expanded domestic partnership law that entitles same-sex couples to the same state-granted rights as heterosexual married couples. With half the precincts reporting, that race was too close to call.

In Kalamazoo, Mich., voters approved a measure that bars discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Copyright Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Comments

  • BB, 2009-11-04 06:46:54

    ""Today’s heartbreaking defeat unfortunately shows that lies and fear can still win at the ballot box..." says the spokesman. As long as one finds consolation in thinking the public has been duped by evil forces, gay marriage will no9t move forward. At some point, there has to be the realization that we ARE different, and have been throughout history. There are other avenues to the same thing without seeming to attack their religious beliefs and cultural mores. But as long as this movement is perceived as a bunch of angry leftist demogogues and anti-Christian bigots, this thing is going nowhere.

  • Ellis Bert, 2009-11-04 09:17:18

    Since when do you put constitutional rights up for referendum. The legislature spoke on this issue and that should have been the end of it.

  • BB, 2009-11-04 10:06:48

    Please quote the section of the Constitution (U.S. or Maine) that discusses marriage as a right. It it not - it is a license. And the legislature is but the representative of the people and can be overriden by the people. That is called "consent of the governed" and in this one instance, they did not consent. That is the actual "end of it."

  • Steve Isherwood, 2009-11-04 10:36:18

    The fact remains that the State and Federal government are happy to take our tax dollars without giving us the same benefits as heterosexuals. If you won’t let me marry, if you won’t let me have children, then why should I have to support the local school system with my tax dollars? The government should either let everyone marry or get out of the marriage business. Remember churches can marry people but only the government can grant a divorce.

  • RevBobJ, 2009-11-04 11:56:05

    As a Franciscan Friar and a lover of Jesus Christ and Almighty God and the pastor of an affirming and welcoming Catholic ministry to the GLBT community it grieves me greatly that the people of the State of Main have succumbed to the influx of money from bigoted people and the Mormon and RC and other right wing churches that have used to Bible to justify their bigotry. Since it is money that seems to dictate what people of those states respect, I suggest that all GLBT persons, their family and friends begin to spend their hard earned money in states and with churches and companies that respect the civil rights of ALL people. God creates people with their sexual orientation for reason known to Him alone and we, mere fallible humans should never question what God does. When we do we commit the gravest of sins. All God’s creation is good and has a purpose in God’s eternal plan therefore, I have to believe that GLBT person have a place in God’s plan and should not be discriminated against. Perhaps if the people of the states that have repealed the civil rights of homosexuals begin to see what the GLBT community contributes to their well being and how much money they spend to sustain the financial well being of those states they may change their minds. In Massachusetts where the right for gay person to marry is legal, the churches have not collapsed, marriages and families have not imploded, in fact just the opposite has happened. The time has come to step up and get involved if you believe in equality and justice. Don’t let any other state make discrimination legal. The next time it may well be that laws against mixed race marriages will be re-enacted or the right for women to vote will be repealed. How about we try to pass a law that will allow us the right to determine who can marry who. When any person is denied their civil rights and equality, all of society is hurt.

  • fern , 2009-11-04 14:00:28

    Ancient Rome was a kingdom first, then became a republic and this republic was more democratic than even the Greeks yet they had a rule called "Caveant Consules..." which meant that in case of a war endangering the empire the two consuls democratically elected would lose their power and be replaced by a dictator called "Imperator" for the duration of the conflict. Would it be that in these days of lore they already knew that the majority could be mislaid by power hungry people? To cheer you up I can only say that in Maine there are more idiots than gay people the votes are proof. As I said long ago and will repeat the best way is Olson and Boies and they scored high with judge Walker lately. Oh and the GLBT had more money than the church but what they don’t have is 17 centuries of brainwashing. Don’t let this put you down.

  • fern , 2009-11-04 14:07:55

    As for Frank Schubert I’ll say I’m not gay but for him I would make an exception and break his backdoor.

Add New Comment