Entertainment :: Theatre

Julius Caesar

by Evan Wynns
EDGE Contributor
Wednesday Sep 2, 2009
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (2)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
Barry Kraft in the title role in the Marin Shakespeare Company’s production of Julius Caesar.
Barry Kraft in the title role in the Marin Shakespeare Company’s production of Julius Caesar.  

Shakespeare is difficult to do nowadays: the dialogue is often opaque, the action can come across as tame in an age of constant digital stimulation, and the themes, while universal, can seem irrelevant to modern life. Yet there are very compelling reasons that his works remain cultural treasures; they address issues of life, death, choices, love, ambition and effort that are perennial facets of the human experience.

That said, the Marin Shakespeare Company’s production of Julius Caesar is not done very well, even taking into account the generosity which one is willing to accord hardworking actors and crew members for such a difficult feat of staging as good Shakespeare.

The company falls victim to the common mistake to make the difficult dialogue compelling through exaggerated declamation and volume. Rather, it is key to invest such words with the cadence and inflection of true life (which is itself arguably the crux of good acting). If anything, the players fail to do so by committing the understandable error of trying too hard to make the script sound the way most people think of Shakespeare. Though the readings are often wooden, there are some bright spots of entertainingly exaggerated performance; in particular Steven Klum deserves mention for his animated and amusing turn as Casca. On the other hand, Barry Kraft in the title role belies his resume as a veteran of all of Shakespeare’s works with his forced hauteur and total lack of a commanding presence.

The action scenes are also hindered by the leaden performances; but to the credit of the company they give it their all, and make the most of a limited budget and the inventive powers of pure imagination. The venue too is a delight, and a warm summer evening provides the ideal backdrop to an evening at the theater.

Above all, it is the thematic content of Shakespeare’s work which suffers here. Julius Caesar is principally a play about power, ambition and loyalty. At conflict are the ideas that no single person should hold absolute power, and the fact that the deeds of great individuals are often the most powerful engines of change and progress in history. In the course of this conflict, people must risk their lives and choose with whom to throw in their lot, with all of the tension, fear, and excitement that entails. The actors, alas, entirely fail to convey the power of these moments.

While it is perhaps harsh to demand perfection from a small and largely unprofessional company of players such as this, the art of theater at a local level is something of an endangered species these days, and though people will arguably always perform Shakespeare, it is of no help to the practice of the art form, or indeed to the propagation of the works of the immortal bard, to stage plays as bland, perfunctory, and flat as the Marin Shakespeare Company’s current staging of Julius Caesar.

Julius Caesar continues through September 26 at the Forest Meadows Amphitheatre, Dominican University of California (on Grand Avenue), San Rafael, CA 94913. For more information visit the Marin Shakespeare Company’s website.

Comments

  • Anonymous, 2009-09-07 13:43:53

    How can an actor be heard at the back of an amphitheatre of the size and acoustic shortcomings of Forest Meadows without being "loud"? And how can a man purport to be a theatre critic while having so limited an understanding of theatrical form and its varying demands and possibilities as to claim that "the crux of good acting," regardless of the play, the character, the venue, or any other variable, is "arguably" the speaking of one’s lines with "the cadence and inflection of true life"? Is Mr. Wynns unaware that to speak verse, for example, as if it were prose, or for that matter any sort of heightened language as if it were low, is not to perform the lines in question, but rather to spite them? Is he likewise unaware that if speaking with "the cadence and inflection of true life" were "the crux of good acting," the ability to act, and indeed to act well, would be roughly as common as the ability to talk? And how "understandable" is it for a purported theatre critic, even one as knowledgeable and accomplished as Mr. Wynns, to patronize an actor of Barry Kraft’s knowledge and accomplishment by charging him with "the understandable error of trying too hard to make the script sound the way most people think of Shakespeare"? And why does Mr. Winns characterize as "largely unprofessional" a company featuring not only the august Mr. Kraft, but also Jay Karnes, Jack Powell, and no fewer than five other union performers, one of whom, William Elsman, is a graduate of the prestigious (take note) PROFESSIONAL Theatre Training Program at the University of Delaware? Does Mr. Winns not realize that this production’s union to non-union ratio is comparable to what one finds at many well regarded Shakespeare festivals throughout the United States, including the Utah Shakespearean Festival, which somehow managed to win a Tony Award despite being "largely unprofessional" by Mr. Winns’ idiosyncratic standard? And how, I wonder, can he claim to have written a proper review of a production of JULIUS CAESAR without having made a single mention of three of the four main characters in the play? Are the actors who played Brutus, Cassius, and Mark Antony too "unprofessional," in spite of their resumes and their union membership, to merit comment from a "professional" theatre critic? And how tremendous are the irony and hypocrisy in Mr. Winns’ publishing a review that on the one hand is itself "not done very well" and on the other hand complains that "the Marin Shakespeare Company’s production of JULIUS CAESAR is not done very well"? "While it is perhaps harsh to demand perfection" from a theatre critic at a "small" publication such as THE EDGE, "the art of theater" criticism "at a local level is something of an endangered species these days," and "it is of no help to the practice of the art form" to publish a review that does not even rise to the level of the merely "bland, perfunctory, and flat."

  • Anonymous, 2009-11-12 14:20:44

    Please, Jessica. Methinks you do protest too much. Barry was once a fantastic actor, but ultimately the dishonorable choices he has made in his life come through and pollute his work. Retire with grace, BK, and vaya con dios.

Add New Comment